Abstract
Background: The role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucosepositron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) for staging and response assessment in marginal zone lymphomas (MZL) is controversial, and its routine use is not recommended in the current Lugano classification.
Methods: The present analysis is based on 156 patients with histologically confirmed MZL who were enrolled in the retrospective IELSG44/PIMENTO study conducted across 21 centers in 4 countries. The cohort included 88 extranodal MZL, 43 nodal MZL, 21 splenic MZL, and 4 MZL not otherwise specified. All patients underwent baseline and end-of-treatment (EOT) 18F-FDG PET/CT scans and clinical follow-up. All scans were centrally reviewed by a panel of four expert nuclear medicine physicians. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was recorded for all detectable lesions, and post-treatment changes (ΔSUVmax) were calculated. Response was assessed using the Deauville 5-point score (DS), with disagreements resolved by consensus.
Results: After a median follow-up of 2.7 years (IQR: 1.4–4.5), 33 patients experienced disease progression. There were 4 deaths attributed to the disease and 4 from other causes (2 infections, 2 unknown). All patients had at least one FDG-positive lesion detected on baseline PET/CT. The median baseline SUVmax was 8.4 (IQR: 5.7–11.3; range: 1.1–65.5). In 145 of 156 cases (93%), the hottest lesion showed uptake greater than liver activity; in 96 cases (62%), the uptake was more than twice that of the liver. In 150 patients (96%), the diagnostic biopsy was obtained from FDG-positive lesions. In 3 patients, the biopsy site was metabolically negative; 2 of these patients had circulating tumor cells, and 1 had splenic MZL diagnosed after splenectomy (before PET/CT).
A complete metabolic response (CMR), assessed at EOT by the Lugano criteria as DS 1–3 versus 4–5, did not significantly predict outcomes. The 5-year time to progression (TTP) was 66% in patients with DS 1–3 and 63% in those with DS 4–5 (p = 0.629). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 89% versus 92%, respectively (p = 0.613). This lack of prognostic value remained even when restricting the analysis to patients with baseline lesions showing uptake greater than liver activity. However, defining CMR as DS ≤2 was associated with improved TTP, though not OS. In the overall cohort, the 5-year TTP was 72% in patients with DS ≤2 compared to 60% in those with DS 3–5 (p = 0.092). Among patients with baseline SUVmax greater than liver activity, TTP was 79% versus 59% (p = 0.041), and in those with baseline SUVmax more than twice the liver uptake, it was 80% versus 52% (p = 0.035).
The post-treatment reduction in SUVmax (median: -77.4%; IQR: -43% to -100%) did not predict outcomes when using conventional thresholds from the literature (-66% and -70%). However, it was predictive of progressive disease in the entire cohort, regardless of baseline SUV, when a ROC-defined cutoff of -85.5% was applied, with a 5-year TTP of 82% in patients with reductions beyond this threshold compared to 57% in those below it (p = 0.027).
Conclusion: These findings suggest that 18F-FDG PET/CT may be useful for response assessment, particularly in patients with baseline SUVmax greater than liver activity, supporting its rational use in MZL.
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal